[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SA1PR12MB7199E3D79881475B4B320F34B0F1A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:16:34 +0000
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, "Liam R. Howlett"
<Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>, Vikram Sethi
<vsethi@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>, Shameer Kolothum
<skolothumtho@...dia.com>, "linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"nao.horiguchi@...il.com" <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "david@...hat.com"
<david@...hat.com>, "lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com"
<lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>, "surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>, "tony.luck@...el.com"
<tony.luck@...el.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org"
<lenb@...nel.org>, "kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"alex@...zbot.org" <alex@...zbot.org>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>, Kirti
Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>, "Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)"
<targupta@...dia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam
<dnigam@...dia.com>, Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com"
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, "ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, "u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com"
<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm: Implement ECC handling for pfn with no struct
page
>>
>> Ah, I see. Seems like a worthy addition to the commit message? I mean,
>> this is really a choice of throwing away memory for the benefit of tlb
>> performance. Seems like a valid choice in your usecase but less so for
>> the average laptop.
>
> No memory is being thrown away, the choice is if the kernel will
> protect itself from loading via userspace issuing repeated reads to
> bad memory.
>
> Ankit please include some of these details in the commit message
Thanks Jason, Liam for the suggestion. I'll update the commit message
in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists