linux-kernel - Re: CVE-2025-39898: e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025102432-motive-passage-eacf@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:26:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...nel.org>
To: Steffen Jaeckel <sjaeckel@...e.de>
Cc: cve@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cve-announce@...r.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	Vitaly Lifshits <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>,
	dima.ruinskiy@...el.com, Mikael Wessel <post@...aelkw.online>,
	Mor Bar-Gabay <morx.bar.gabay@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch
Subject: Re: CVE-2025-39898: e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 12:53:44PM +0200, Steffen Jaeckel wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 2025-10-01 09:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Description
> > ===========
> > 
> > In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
> > 
> > e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom
> > 
> > Fix a possible heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom function by adding
> > input validation for the requested length of the change in the EEPROM.
> > In addition, change the variable type from int to size_t for better
> > code practices and rearrange declarations to RCT.
> > 
> > The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2025-39898 to this issue.
> > 
> > 
> > Affected and fixed versions
> > ===========================
> > 
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.4.299 with commit ea832ec0583e2398ea0c5ed8d902c923e16f53c4
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.10.243 with commit ce8829d3d44b8622741bccca9f4408bc3da30b2b
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 5.15.192 with commit 99a8772611e2d7ec318be7f0f072037914a1f509
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.1.151 with commit b48adcacc34fbbc49046a7ee8a97839bef369c85
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.6.105 with commit 50a84d5c814039ad2abe2748aec3e89324a548a7
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.12.46 with commit b370f7b1f470a8d5485cc1e40e8ff663bb55d712
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.16.6 with commit 0aec3211283482cfcdd606d1345e1f9acbcabd31
> > 	Issue introduced in 2.6.24 with commit bc7f75fa97884d41efbfde1397b621fefb2550b4 and fixed in 6.17 with commit 90fb7db49c6dbac961c6b8ebfd741141ffbc8545
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> we believe that this CVE is invalid since the sole caller is
> `net/ethtool/ioctl.c:ethtool_set_eeprom()`, which already does all the
> necessary checks before invoking a driver specific implementation.

Great, will this commit then be reverted?  I'll go revoke this cve now,
thanks for the review.

greg k-h