[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89812f66-25a6-4f9e-aa4f-74adbf116db8@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:12:55 +0200
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>
Cc: phasta@...nel.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-fence: Correct return of dma_fence_driver_name()
On 10/24/25 1:31 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Also, the short name can be reduced from a verbose starting point similar to yours:
>
> "unknown-driver-is-detached-from-the-signaled-fence"
> "driver-detached-from-the-fence"
> "driver-detached"
>
> Or keep "detached-driver" as good enough. Mea culpa for typing it up transposed. :)
"detached-driver" is misleading, just because the fence is signaled it doesn't
mean that the driver is detached.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists