lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251025211519.1616439-3-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:15:17 -0600
From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] checkpatch: recognize __chkp_no_side_effects(_var) hint macro

Teach checkpatch --strict to allow an author to suppress specific
var-reuse complaints:

  CHECK: Macro argument reuse '_var' - possible side-effects?

Consider:

   #define module_param_named(name, value, type, perm)  \
  +     __chkp_no_side_effects(name, value)		\
        param_check_##type(name, &(value));		\
        module_param_cb(name, &param_ops_##type, &value, perm); \
        __MODULE_PARM_TYPE(name, #type)

Without the +line, this kind of multi-statement macro-defn would cause
checkpatch to carp about name and value being reused.

Note that it wouldn't complain about type, even though type is
expanded 3 times, because checkpatch knew to strip # and ## constructs
on an arg before counting its uses.

module_param_named is actually a named $exception, amongst a ~dozen
others, so it wouldn't draw the complaint (I said kind of above), but
this approach doesn't require further checkpatch tweaks, is specific
to the _vars named, and is author initiated, not a carte-blanche
exception on the macro-name.

IIRC, trybot kicks of a CI pipeline that calls checkpatch --strict,
this hint could help reduce CI-noise going forward.

Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 2b0275dcc5a4..bc807c20fcde 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6070,11 +6070,24 @@ sub process {
 			        next if ($arg =~ /\.\.\./);
 			        next if ($arg =~ /^type$/i);
 				my $tmp_stmt = $define_stmt;
-				$tmp_stmt =~ s/\b(__must_be_array|offsetof|sizeof|sizeof_field|__stringify|typeof|__typeof__|__builtin\w+|typecheck\s*\(\s*$Type\s*,|\#+)\s*\(*\s*$arg\s*\)*\b//g;
-				$tmp_stmt =~ s/\#+\s*$arg\b//g;
-				$tmp_stmt =~ s/\b$arg\s*\#\#//g;
+
+				$tmp_stmt =~ s/\#+\s*$arg\b/drx_print("strip '#|## arg catenations")/ge;
+				$tmp_stmt =~ s/\b$arg\s*\#\#/drx_print("strip 'arg ##' catenations");/ge;
+
+				$tmp_stmt =~ s{
+					\b(__must_be_array|offsetof|sizeof|sizeof_field|__stringify|
+					   typeof|__typeof__|__builtin\w+|typecheck
+					   \s*\(\s*$Type\s*,|\#+)\s*\(*\s*$arg\s*\)*\b }
+				{
+					drx_print("-builtins-");
+				}xge;
+
+				my $no_side_effect_vars = "";
+				if ($tmp_stmt =~ s/__chkp_no_side_effects\((.+)\)//) {
+					$no_side_effect_vars = $1;
+				}
 				my $use_cnt = () = $tmp_stmt =~ /\b$arg\b/g;
-				if ($use_cnt > 1) {
+				if ($use_cnt > 1 and $no_side_effect_vars !~ m/\b$arg\b/) {
 					CHK("MACRO_ARG_REUSE",
 					    "Macro argument reuse '$arg' - possible side-effects?\n" . "$herectx");
 				    }
-- 
2.51.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ