[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8d7b58f482cf0669bc5028dd0e01301f7f526e.1761481839.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:41:54 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 03/30] docs: reporting-issues: add conclusion to the step-by-step guide
Idea and text comes from
Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
index 90b50c27c0d2b6..9676ba85e1b73c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
@@ -241,6 +241,20 @@ kernels regularly rebased on those. If that is the case, follow these steps:
The reference section below explains each of these steps in more detail.
+Conclusion of the step-by-step guide
+------------------------------------
+
+Did you run into trouble following the step-by-step guide not cleared up by the
+reference section below? Did you spot errors? Or do you have ideas on how to
+improve the guide?
+
+If any of that applies, please take a moment and let the primary author of this
+text, Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>, know by email while ideally CCing
+the public Linux docs mailing list <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>. Such feedback is
+vital to improve this text further, which is in everybody's interest, as it will
+enable more people to master the task described here.
+
+
Reference section: Reporting issues to the kernel maintainers
=============================================================
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists