[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251026143140.GA22463@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 15:31:40 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] release_task: kill unnecessary rcu_read_lock() around
dec_rlimit_ucounts()
rcu_read_lock() was added to shut RCU-lockdep up when this code used
__task_cred()->rcu_dereference(), but after the commit 21d1c5e386bc
("Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts") it is no longer needed:
task_ucounts()->task_cred_xxx() takes rcu_read_lock() itself.
NOTE: task_ucounts() returns the pointer to another rcu-protected data,
struct ucounts. So it should either be used when task->real_cred and thus
task->real_cred->ucounts is stable (release_task, copy_process, copy_creds),
or it should be called under rcu_read_lock(). In both cases it is pointless
to take rcu_read_lock() to read the cred->ucounts pointer.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 9f74e8f1c431..f041f0c05ebb 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -251,10 +251,8 @@ void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
memset(&post, 0, sizeof(post));
/* don't need to get the RCU readlock here - the process is dead and
- * can't be modifying its own credentials. But shut RCU-lockdep up */
- rcu_read_lock();
+ * can't be modifying its own credentials. */
dec_rlimit_ucounts(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, 1);
- rcu_read_unlock();
pidfs_exit(p);
cgroup_release(p);
--
2.25.1.362.g51ebf55
Powered by blists - more mailing lists