[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251026184143.280797-1-igor.korotin.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 18:41:43 +0000
From: Igor Korotin <igor.korotin.linux@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Asahi Lina <lina+kernel@...hilina.net>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@....com>,
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
Xiangfei Ding <dingxiangfei2009@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/3] rust: i2c: Add basic I2C driver abstractions
Hello Danilo
> On 10/5/25 12:23 PM, Igor Korotin wrote:
> > +impl Registration {
> > + /// The C `i2c_new_client_device` function wrapper for manual I2C client creation.
> > + pub fn new(i2c_adapter: &I2cAdapter, i2c_board_info: &I2cBoardInfo) -> Result<Self> {
> > + // SAFETY: the kernel guarantees that `i2c_new_client_device()` returns either a valid
> > + // pointer or NULL. `from_err_ptr` separates errors. Following `NonNull::new` checks for NULL.
> > + let raw_dev = from_err_ptr(unsafe {
> > + bindings::i2c_new_client_device(i2c_adapter.as_raw(), i2c_board_info.as_raw())
> > + })?;
> > +
> > + let dev_ptr = NonNull::new(raw_dev).ok_or(ENODEV)?;
> > +
> > + Ok(Self(dev_ptr))
> > + }
> > +}
>
> I wonder if we want to ensure that a Registration can't out-live the driver that
> registers the I2C client device.
>
> This should only ever be called by drivers bound to more complex devices, so if
> the parent driver is unbound I don't think I2C client device registered by this
> driver should be able to survive.
>
> Hence, I think Registration::new() should return
> impl PinInit<Devres<Self>, Error> instead.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but as far as I understand, Devres is bound to
an existing device. However `Registration::new` creates new device and registers
new i2c_client using function `i2c_new_client_device`. Created i2c_client uses
i2c_adapter as its parent.
The driver that declares Registration doesn't own that i2c_adapter. `Registration`
itself is not part of the new client’s managed resources, so returning
`impl PinInit<Devres<Self>, Error>` wouldn’t make sense here.
Drop for Registration calls `i2c_unregister_client()`, which gracefully unregisters
and deallocates the i2c_client.
Cheers
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists