[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f36a77b1-79ce-4bd4-ba4a-b9260bae7f11@web.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:43:20 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: j721e: Use inline reset GPIO assignment and
drop local variable
> The result of devm_gpiod_get_optional() is now assigned directly
> assigned to pcie->reset_gpio. This removes a superfluous local gpiod
> variable, improving code readability and compactness. The functionality
> remains unchanged, but the code is now more streamlined
Would a corresponding imperative wording become helpful for an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc3#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists