[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bdfd4ab9-3db1-4ce3-8f9a-8e4fceb5488a@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 16:12:02 +1030
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
To: Shardul Bankar <shardulsb08@...il.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fdmanana@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 fs/btrfs v3] btrfs: fix memory leak of qgroup_list in
btrfs_add_qgroup_relation
在 2025/10/26 06:30, Shardul Bankar 写道:
You don't need to include the "fs/btrfs v3" in the [PATCH] part.
You can refer to the mailing list for how to add versions to the patches.
Thankfully the "fs/btrfs v3" part will just be discarded by git-am.
> When btrfs_add_qgroup_relation() is called with invalid qgroup levels
> (src >= dst), the function returns -EINVAL directly without freeing the
> preallocated qgroup_list structure passed by the caller. This causes a
> memory leak because the caller unconditionally sets the pointer to NULL
> after the call, preventing any cleanup.
>
> The issue occurs because the level validation check happens before the
> mutex is acquired and before any error handling path that would free
> the prealloc pointer. On this early return, the cleanup code at the
> 'out' label (which includes kfree(prealloc)) is never reached.
>
> In btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign(), the code pattern is:
>
> prealloc = kzalloc(sizeof(*prealloc), GFP_KERNEL);
> ret = btrfs_add_qgroup_relation(trans, sa->src, sa->dst, prealloc);
> prealloc = NULL; // Always set to NULL regardless of return value
> ...
> kfree(prealloc); // This becomes kfree(NULL), does nothing
>
> When the level check fails, 'prealloc' is never freed by either the
> callee or the caller, resulting in a 64-byte memory leak per failed
> operation. This can be triggered repeatedly by an unprivileged user
> with access to a writable btrfs mount, potentially exhausting kernel
> memory.
>
> Fix this by freeing prealloc before the early return, ensuring prealloc
> is always freed on all error paths.
>
> Fixes: 4addc1ffd67a ("btrfs: qgroup: preallocate memory before adding a relation")
> Signed-off-by: Shardul Bankar <shardulsb08@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
And now pushed to for-next branch.
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
>
> v3:
> - Update Fixes: tag to correct commit SHA as suggested by Filipe Manana.
> - No code changes.
>
> v2:
> - Free prealloc directly before returning -EINVAL (no mutex held),
> per review from Qu Wenruo.
> - Drop goto-based cleanup.
>
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index 1175b8192cd7..31ad8580322a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -1539,8 +1539,10 @@ int btrfs_add_qgroup_relation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 src, u64 dst
> ASSERT(prealloc);
>
> /* Check the level of src and dst first */
> - if (btrfs_qgroup_level(src) >= btrfs_qgroup_level(dst))
> + if (btrfs_qgroup_level(src) >= btrfs_qgroup_level(dst)) {
> + kfree(prealloc);
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock);
> if (!fs_info->quota_root) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists