linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] docs: reporting-issues: rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zf9cnu3e.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:16:21 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] docs: reporting-issues: rework

Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> writes:

>  I worked on-and-off on this for maybe two years and the problem is:
> what started as fine tuning in various places piled up. That together
> with the newly added links & anchors and some text movements makes the
> patchset huge. When you ignore those two aspects and look at individual
> patches using a word diff algorithm it looks a lot less scary, but it
> remains big – and thus sadly puts some load on reviewers and
> translators. Sorry. I think it's worth it and tried to split things up
> to facilitate handling.

It is indeed a lot, it's going to be hard to get people (including me)
to look at it all.  I think you should really consider breaking this
into smaller sets and getting them through one at a time...

I'll look at a few of these, but certainly won't get through the whole
set today.

Thanks,

jon

P.S. Grumbling aside, it's good to have you back...