lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89afdfc8-9c78-4128-ab73-d569f6ac0c06@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:32:31 -0500
From: Babu Moger <bmoger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, tony.luck@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
 mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: corbet@....net, Dave.Martin@....com, james.morse@....com, x86@...nel.org,
 hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
 rdunlap@...radead.org, pmladek@...e.com, kees@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
 fvdl@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
 xin@...or.com, thomas.lendacky@....com, sohil.mehta@...el.com,
 jarkko@...nel.org, chang.seok.bae@...el.com, ebiggers@...gle.com,
 elena.reshetova@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, mario.limonciello@....com,
 perry.yuan@....com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] fs/resctrl: Add user interface to
 enable/disable io_alloc feature

Hi Reinette,

Thanks for the review.

On 10/24/25 18:43, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/21/25 4:54 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> When resctrl is mounted with "-o cdp" to enable code/data prioritization,
>> there are two L3 resources that can support I/O allocation: L3CODE and
>> L3DATA.  From resctrl fs perspective the two resources share a CLOSID and
>> the architecture's available CLOSID are halved to support this.  The
>> architecture's underlying CLOSID used by SDCIAE when CDP is enabled is the
>> CLOSID associated with the CDP_CODE resource, but from resctrl's perspective
>> there is only one CLOSID for both CDP_CODE and CDP_DATA. CDP_DATA is thus
>> not usable for general (CPU) cache allocation nor I/O allocation. Keep the
>> CDP_CODE and CDP_DATA I/O alloc status in sync to avoid any confusion to
>> user space. That is, enabling io_alloc on CDP_CODE does so on CDP_DATA and
>> vice-versa, and keep the I/O allocation CBMs of CDP_CODE and CDP_3DATA in
>> sync.
> CDP_3DATA -> CDP_DATA

Sure.


>
> ...
>
>> +ssize_t resctrl_io_alloc_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>> +			       size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
>> +{
>> +	struct resctrl_schema *s = rdt_kn_parent_priv(of->kn);
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
>> +	char const *grp_name;
>> +	u32 io_alloc_closid;
>> +	bool enable;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = kstrtobool(buf, &enable);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	cpus_read_lock();
>> +	mutex_lock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>> +
>> +	rdt_last_cmd_clear();
>> +
>> +	if (!r->cache.io_alloc_capable) {
>> +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("io_alloc is not supported on %s\n", s->name);
>> +		ret = -ENODEV;
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* If the feature is already up to date, no action is needed. */
>> +	if (resctrl_arch_get_io_alloc_enabled(r) == enable)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +
>> +	io_alloc_closid = resctrl_io_alloc_closid(r);
>> +	if (!resctrl_io_alloc_closid_supported(io_alloc_closid)) {
>> +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("io_alloc CLOSID (ctrl_hw_id) %u is not available\n",
>> +				    io_alloc_closid);
>> +		ret = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (enable) {
>> +		if (!closid_alloc_fixed(io_alloc_closid)) {
>> +			grp_name = rdtgroup_name_by_closid(io_alloc_closid);
>> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(!grp_name);
>> +			rdt_last_cmd_printf("CLOSID (ctrl_hw_id) %u for io_alloc is used by %s group\n",
>> +					    io_alloc_closid, grp_name ? grp_name : "another");
>> +			ret = -ENOSPC;
>> +			goto out_unlock;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ret = resctrl_io_alloc_init_cbm(s, io_alloc_closid);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			rdt_last_cmd_puts("Failed to initialize io_alloc allocations\n");
>> +			closid_free(io_alloc_closid);
>> +			goto out_unlock;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		closid_free(io_alloc_closid);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = resctrl_arch_io_alloc_enable(r, enable);
> I missed this earlier ... if enable == true then a CLOSID would have been allocated
> at this point but resctrl_arch_io_alloc_enable() is not expected to change the arch's
> state when it fails. io_alloc arch state would thus remain "disabled" while the io_alloc
> CLOSID is allocated. io_alloc CLOSID should free'd on failure of
> resctrl_arch_io_alloc_enable() to address this scenario.

Sure. Will add the check:

ret = resctrl_arch_io_alloc_enable(r, enable);

if (enable && ret) {
           rdt_last_cmd_puts("Failed to enable io_alloc feature\n");
            closid_free(io_alloc_closid);
}


>
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
>> +	cpus_read_unlock();
>> +
>> +	return ret ?: nbytes;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/internal.h b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> index a18ed8889396..26ab8f9b30d8 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> @@ -390,6 +390,8 @@ void rdt_staged_configs_clear(void);
>>   
>>   bool closid_allocated(unsigned int closid);
>>   
>> +bool closid_alloc_fixed(u32 closid);
>> +
>>   int resctrl_find_cleanest_closid(void);
>>   
>>   void *rdt_kn_parent_priv(struct kernfs_node *kn);
>> @@ -428,6 +430,15 @@ ssize_t mbm_L3_assignments_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf, size_t
>>   				 loff_t off);
>>   int resctrl_io_alloc_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of, struct seq_file *seq, void *v);
>>   
>> +int rdtgroup_init_cat(struct resctrl_schema *s, u32 closid);
>> +
>> +enum resctrl_conf_type resctrl_peer_type(enum resctrl_conf_type my_type);
>> +
>> +ssize_t resctrl_io_alloc_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
>> +			       size_t nbytes, loff_t off);
>> +
>> +const char *rdtgroup_name_by_closid(int closid);
> Could this please keep the closid type consistent as u32?


Sure. Will do.

Thanks

Babu



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ