[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251027064926.GA13214@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 07:49:26 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme-pci: migrate to dma_map_phys instead of
map_page
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 08:14:18AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This actually has block and nvme bits, so the subject line should
> > say that.
> >
> > > + unsigned int attrs = 0;
> >
> > attrs is always zero here, no need to start passing it for the
> > map_phys conversion alone.
> >
> > > + unsigned int attrs = 0;
> >
> > Same here.
>
> It gave me more clean second patch where I only added new attribute, but
> if it doesn't look right to you, let's change.
The usual rule is do one thing at a time. There might be an occasinal
slight bend of the rule to make life easier, but I don't think that
really fits here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists