[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:41:27 +0800
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
CC: <oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, HAN Yuwei <hrx@...t.moe>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [btrfs] b7fdfd29a1: postmark.transactions 9.5%
regression
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 9.5% regression of postmark.transactions on:
commit: b7fdfd29a136a17c5c8ad9e9bbf89c48919c3d19 ("btrfs: only set the device specific options after devices are opened")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
we are in fact not sure what's the connection between this change and the
postmark.transactions performance. still report out due to below checks.
[still regression on linus/master 4bb1f7e19c4a1d6eeb52b80acff5ac63edd1b91d]
[regression chould be solved by reverting this commit on linus/master head]
[still regression on linux-next/master 72fb0170ef1f45addf726319c52a0562b6913707]
testcase: postmark
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 224 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8380H CPU @ 2.90GHz (Cooper Lake) with 192G memory
parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: btrfs
fs1: nfsv4
number: 4000n
trans: 10000s
subdirs: 100d
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251027/202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs1/fs/kconfig/number/rootfs/subdirs/tbox_group/testcase/trans:
gcc-14/performance/1HDD/nfsv4/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-9.4/4000n/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/100d/lkp-cpl-4sp2/postmark/10000s
commit:
53a4acbfc1 ("btrfs: fix memory leak on duplicated memory in the qgroup assign ioctl")
b7fdfd29a1 ("btrfs: only set the device specific options after devices are opened")
53a4acbfc1de85fa b7fdfd29a136a17c5c8ad9e9bbf
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
2010 +10.5% 2222 nfsstat.Client.nfs.v4.open_noat
97983 ± 11% +18.5% 116101 numa-numastat.node1.other_node
97983 ± 11% +18.5% 116101 numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other
16001 ± 5% -7.5% 14797 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load.avg
1474354 ± 3% +9.9% 1620281 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.avg
756151 ± 3% +10.0% 831539 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.max_idle_balance_cost.avg
3585 -2.6% 3490 perf-stat.i.context-switches
6141 ± 2% +4.0% 6385 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
5796 ± 2% +3.9% 6024 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
3580 -2.6% 3486 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
9.548e+11 +7.3% 1.025e+12 perf-stat.total.instructions
136494 +4.3% 142419 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
136494 +4.3% 142419 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
2784208 +4.8% 2917180 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
2435763 +5.5% 2568673 proc-vmstat.numa_local
3042276 +5.1% 3196281 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
2627503 +6.9% 2808220 proc-vmstat.pgfault
2754381 +5.4% 2903034 proc-vmstat.pgfree
97857 +6.3% 104058 proc-vmstat.pgreuse
9.80 -9.4% 8.88 postmark.creation_mixed_trans
112312 -7.0% 104473 postmark.data_read
203502 -7.0% 189298 postmark.data_written
9.80 -9.4% 8.88 postmark.deletion_mixed_trans
9.73 -9.5% 8.80 postmark.files_appended
12.59 -7.0% 11.70 postmark.files_created
12.59 -7.0% 11.70 postmark.files_deleted
9.87 -9.5% 8.93 postmark.files_read
715.35 +7.5% 768.93 postmark.time.elapsed_time
715.35 +7.5% 768.93 postmark.time.elapsed_time.max
51508 -1.6% 50690 postmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
19.61 -9.5% 17.75 postmark.transactions
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists