[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aP84R10AL2UE9OGG@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:15:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] checkpatch: Don't warn on "orhapned" DT schema
file
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:06:35AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Currently checkpatch warns is the DT schema file is absent in MAINTAINERS.
> However the DT schema files are self-contained in this sense and
> have embedded information about maintainers of it. This is a requirement.
> Hence, avoid checkpatch warning about it.
...
> + ($realfile =~ m@...cumentation/devicetree/bindings/.*\.txt$@)) {
> + if ($realfile =~ m@...clude/asm/@) {
Crap. I forgot leftovers once again, v2 is coming soon...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists