[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aP885cVvKxE5xMBW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:35:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Akhilesh Patil <akhilesh@...iitb.ac.in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] checkpatch: Don't warn on "orhapned" DT schema
file
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:25:58AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/10/2025 10:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Currently checkpatch warns is the DT schema file is absent in MAINTAINERS.
> > However the DT schema files are self-contained in this sense and
> > have embedded information about maintainers of it. This is a requirement.
> > Hence, avoid checkpatch warning about it.
> >
> > Requested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> No, that's not true.
>
> First, there is no such tag.
No, that's not true.
$ git log --oneline --grep ^Requested-by: | wc -l
357
> Second, I never requested it.
>
> NAK
Fair enough, I'll drop the tag.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists