[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251027094019.foWBPFO2@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:40:19 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 05/12] rseq: Add prctl() to enable time slice
extensions
On 2025-10-22 14:57:34 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/rseq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rseq.h
> @@ -164,4 +164,13 @@ void rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs);
> static inline void rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RSEQ_SLICE_EXTENSION
> +int rseq_slice_extension_prctl(unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3);
> +#else /* CONFIG_RSEQ_SLICE_EXTENSION */
> +static inline int rseq_slice_extension_prctl(unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
This should be -ENOTSUPP as in the !rseq_slice_extension_enabled() case.
After all it is the same condition.
> +}
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists