linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-phy-7nm: Add Kaanapali DSi PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2pyurzgalnjwsxqw7qhfguebps45ne6iua7gvioagz554ra6ru@nhe4tnmabqp2>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:30:43 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: yuanjiey <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: robin.clark@....qualcomm.com, lumag@...nel.org, abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev,
        sean@...rly.run, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, airlied@...il.com,
        simona@...ll.ch, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
        tzimmermann@...e.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com, jonathan@...ek.ca,
        quic_khsieh@...cinc.com, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
        aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-phy-7nm: Add
 Kaanapali DSi PHY

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:10:29PM +0800, yuanjiey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 03:16:31PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 04:06:07PM +0800, yuanjie yang wrote:
> > > From: Yuanjie Yang <yuanjie.yang@....qualcomm.com>
> > 
> > In the subject: DSI, not DSi
> OK will note.
> 
>  
> > > 
> > > Add DSI PHY for Kaanapali.
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> DSI phy for Kaanapali have no significant diiference with previous version(SM8750).
> But some register change make it imcompatible with previous version(SM8750).

It's either "no significant difference" or "register change make it
incompatible". You can't say both.

> 
> I will give this reason in my next patch.
> 
> Thanks
> Yuanjie.
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry