| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <97ea4728568459f501ddcab6c378c29064630bb9.1761658310.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 21:58:17 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@...ux.dev>
To: hannes@...xchg.org,
hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev,
david@...hat.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
ziy@...dia.com,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
imran.f.khan@...cle.com,
kamalesh.babulal@...cle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com,
weixugc@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 04/26] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru()
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
In a subsequent patch, we'll reparent the LRU folios. The folios that are
moved to the appropriate LRU list can undergo reparenting during the
move_folios_to_lru() process. Hence, it's incorrect for the caller to hold
a lruvec lock. Instead, we should utilize the more general interface of
folio_lruvec_relock_irq() to obtain the correct lruvec lock.
This patch involves only code refactoring and doesn't introduce any
functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3a1044ce30f1e..660cd40cfddd4 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1883,24 +1883,27 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct pglist_data *pgdat, int file,
/*
* move_folios_to_lru() moves folios from private @list to appropriate LRU list.
*
- * Returns the number of pages moved to the given lruvec.
+ * Returns the number of pages moved to the appropriate lruvec.
+ *
+ * Note: The caller must not hold any lruvec lock.
*/
-static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
- struct list_head *list)
+static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct list_head *list)
{
int nr_pages, nr_moved = 0;
+ struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL;
struct folio_batch free_folios;
folio_batch_init(&free_folios);
while (!list_empty(list)) {
struct folio *folio = lru_to_folio(list);
+ lruvec = folio_lruvec_relock_irq(folio, lruvec);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_lru(folio), folio);
list_del(&folio->lru);
if (unlikely(!folio_evictable(folio))) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
folio_putback_lru(folio);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec = NULL;
continue;
}
@@ -1922,19 +1925,15 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
folio_unqueue_deferred_split(folio);
if (folio_batch_add(&free_folios, folio) == 0) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ lruvec = NULL;
}
continue;
}
- /*
- * All pages were isolated from the same lruvec (and isolation
- * inhibits memcg migration).
- */
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_matches_lruvec(folio, lruvec), folio);
lruvec_add_folio(lruvec, folio);
nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -1943,11 +1942,12 @@ static unsigned int move_folios_to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec,
workingset_age_nonresident(lruvec, nr_pages);
}
+ if (lruvec)
+ lruvec_unlock_irq(lruvec);
+
if (free_folios.nr) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios(&free_folios);
free_unref_folios(&free_folios);
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
}
return nr_moved;
@@ -2016,9 +2016,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
nr_reclaimed = shrink_folio_list(&folio_list, pgdat, sc, &stat, false,
lruvec_memcg(lruvec));
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
- move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &folio_list);
+ move_folios_to_lru(&folio_list);
+ spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
__mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),
stat.nr_demoted);
__mod_node_page_state(pgdat, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + file, -nr_taken);
@@ -2166,11 +2166,10 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
/*
* Move folios back to the lru list.
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
-
- nr_activate = move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &l_active);
- nr_deactivate = move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &l_inactive);
+ nr_activate = move_folios_to_lru(&l_active);
+ nr_deactivate = move_folios_to_lru(&l_inactive);
+ spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
count_memcg_events(lruvec_memcg(lruvec), PGDEACTIVATE, nr_deactivate);
@@ -4735,14 +4734,15 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
set_mask_bits(&folio->flags.f, LRU_REFS_FLAGS, BIT(PG_active));
}
- spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
-
- move_folios_to_lru(lruvec, &list);
+ move_folios_to_lru(&list);
+ local_irq_disable();
walk = current->reclaim_state->mm_walk;
if (walk && walk->batched) {
walk->lruvec = lruvec;
+ spin_lock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
reset_batch_size(walk);
+ spin_unlock(&lruvec->lru_lock);
}
__mod_lruvec_state(lruvec, PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD + reclaimer_offset(sc),
@@ -4754,7 +4754,7 @@ static int evict_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
count_memcg_events(memcg, item, reclaimed);
__count_vm_events(PGSTEAL_ANON + type, reclaimed);
- spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
+ local_irq_enable();
list_splice_init(&clean, &list);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists