[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nii94XPR_vkE6NBYmpfz=AJS+5gr0t3Hbc1ewdEZ_jeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:07:53 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org, a.hindborg@...nel.org,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, mmaurer@...gle.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] rust: uaccess: add UserSliceWriter::write_slice_file()
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 4:32 PM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> + /// Writes raw data to this user pointer from a kernel buffer partially.
We use "user pointer" in a few places (including another of the added
ones), while "user slice" in others -- shouldn't we just use "user
slice"?
By the way, for new APIs with several arguments and potential paths
due to the `offset`, it wouldn't hurt to have an example (even if
build-only) with a couple asserts to show how the API behaves. But I
can create a good first issue for that if you prefer.
Similarly (another potential good first issue), should we use e.g.
#[doc(alias = "simple_read_from_buffer")]`
?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists