[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xboq73zw752odclybviqnl75pp2nl2eamdvcdv2idqljck7qvu@zdh6ny7nja3w>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:30:37 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: ucsi: Skip setting orientation for UCSI
version 2.0 and above
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 05:19:58PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 25-10-28 16:39:19, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > In case of UCSI version 2.0 and above, if the orientation is set from
> > glink as well, it will trigger the consumers along the graph (PHYs,
> > repeaters and so on) to reconfigure a second time. This might break
> > the consumer drivers which aren't currently implemented to drop the
> > second request of setting the same orientation.
> >
> > So lets leave the orientation setting to the UCSI generic implementation
> > for all platform that implement UCSI spec 2.0 and above.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
>
> Ignore this one please, as it is incomplete.
>
> We need to also set the orientation_aware in pmic_glink_ucsi_update_connector()
> if the ucsi version is at least 2.0.
Note, I think it should be set in the core rather than setting it in the
driver.
>
> Will do and respin.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists