[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1c9aedf-fb1b-47c8-8204-dbc28e9da4f3@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 17:13:49 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@...hat.com>
Cc: osalvador@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix HVO crash on s390
On 28.10.25 17:05, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 28/10/2025 15:39, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> A reproducible crash occurs when enabling HVO on s390. The crash and the
>> proposed fix were worked on an s390 KVM guest running on an older
>> hypervisor, as I don't have access to an LPAR. However, the same
>> issue should occur on bare-metal.
>>
>> Reproducer (it may take a few runs to trigger):
>>
>> # sysctl vm.hugetlb_optimize_vmemmap=1
>> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>> # echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>>
>> Crash log:
>>
>> [ 52.340369] list_del corruption. prev->next should be 000000d382110008, but was 000000d7116d3880. (prev=000000d7116d3910)
>> [ 52.340420] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 52.340424] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62!
>> [ 52.340566] monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1]SMP
>> [ 52.340573] Modules linked in: ctcm fsm qeth ccwgroup zfcp scsi_transport_fc qdio dasd_fba_mod dasd_eckd_mod dasd_mod xfs ghash_s390 prng des_s390 libdes sha3_512_s390 sha3_256_s390 virtio_net virtio_blk net_failover sha_common failover dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod paes_s390 crypto_engine pkey_cca pkey_ep11 zcrypt pkey_pckmo pkey aes_s390
>> [ 52.340606] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1672 Comm: root-rep2 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.18.0-rc3 #1 NONE
>> [ 52.340610] Hardware name: IBM 3931 LA1 400 (KVM/Linux)
>> [ 52.340611] Krnl PSW : 0704c00180000000 0000015710cda7fe (__list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0xfe/0x128)
>> [ 52.340619] R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
>> [ 52.340622] Krnl GPRS: c0000000ffffefff 0000000100000027 000000000000006d 0000000000000000
>> [ 52.340623] 000000d7116d35d8 000000d7116d35d0 0000000000000002 000000d7116d39b0
>> [ 52.340625] 000000d7116d3880 000000d7116d3910 000000d7116d3910 000000d382110008
>> [ 52.340626] 000003ffac1ccd08 000000d7116d39b0 0000015710cda7fa 000000d7116d37d0
>> [ 52.340632] Krnl Code: 0000015710cda7ee: c020003e496f larl %r2,00000157114a3acc
>> 0000015710cda7f4: c0e5ffd5280e brasl %r14,000001571077f810
>> #0000015710cda7fa: af000000 mc 0,0
>> >0000015710cda7fe: b9040029 lgr %r2,%r9
>> 0000015710cda802: c0e5ffe5e193 brasl %r14,0000015710996b28
>> 0000015710cda808: e34090080004 lg %r4,8(%r9)
>> 0000015710cda80e: b9040059 lgr %r5,%r9
>> 0000015710cda812: b9040038 lgr %r3,%r8
>> [ 52.340643] Call Trace:
>> [ 52.340645] [<0000015710cda7fe>] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0xfe/0x128
>> [ 52.340649] ([<0000015710cda7fa>] __list_del_entry_valid_or_report+0xfa/0x128)
>> [ 52.340652] [<0000015710a30b2e>] hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folios+0x96/0x138
>> [ 52.340655] [<0000015710a268ac>] update_and_free_pages_bulk+0x64/0x150
>> [ 52.340659] [<0000015710a26f8a>] set_max_huge_pages+0x4ca/0x6f0
>> [ 52.340662] [<0000015710a273ba>] hugetlb_sysctl_handler_common+0xea/0x120
>> [ 52.340665] [<0000015710a27484>] hugetlb_sysctl_handler+0x44/0x50
>> [ 52.340667] [<0000015710b53ffa>] proc_sys_call_handler+0x17a/0x280
>> [ 52.340672] [<0000015710a90968>] vfs_write+0x2c8/0x3a0
>> [ 52.340676] [<0000015710a90bd2>] ksys_write+0x72/0x100
>> [ 52.340679] [<00000157111483a8>] __do_syscall+0x150/0x318
>> [ 52.340682] [<0000015711153a5e>] system_call+0x6e/0x90
>> [ 52.340684] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>> [ 52.340684] [<000001571077f85c>] _printk+0x4c/0x58
>> [ 52.340690] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>
>> This issue was introduced by commit f13b83fdd996 ("hugetlb: batch TLB
>> flushes when freeing vmemmap"). Before that change, the HVO
>> implementation called flush_tlb_kernel_range() each time a vmemmap
>> PMD split and remapping was performed. The mentioned commit changed this
>> to issue a few flush_tlb_all() calls after performing all remappings.
>>
>> However, on s390, flush_tlb_kernel_range() expands to
>> __tlb_flush_kernel() while flush_tlb_all() is not implemented. As a
>> result, we went from flushing the TLB for every remapping to no flushing
>> at all.
>>
>> This commit fixes this by introducing vmemmap_flush_tlb_all(), which
>> expands to __tlb_flush_kernel() on s390 and to flush_tlb_all() on other
>> archs.
>>
>> Fixes: f13b83fdd996 ("hugetlb: batch TLB flushes when freeing vmemmap")>
> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> index ba0fb1b6a5a8..5819a3088850 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ struct vmemmap_remap_walk {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> };
>>
>> +static inline void vmemmap_flush_tlb_all(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_S390
>> + __tlb_flush_kernel();
>> +#else
>> + flush_tlb_all();
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>
> Wouldn't a better fix be to implement flush_tlb_all() in
> s390/include/asm/tlbflush.h since that aliases to __tlb_flush_kernel()?
Agreed, that feels cleaner and avoids this ifdef here.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists