[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nt2rifeuokz73xtzqycguhrvki3vpi2pb24tuv36h6m2oz5fsv@7g33zih37yqx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:59:28 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vma: small VMA lock cleanups
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:09:02AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> We declare vma_start_read() as a static function in mm/mmap_lock.c, so
> there is no need to provide a stub for !CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK.
>
> __is_vma_write_locked() is declared in a header and should therefore be static
> inline.
>
> Put parens around (refcnt & VMA_LOCK_OFFSET) in is_vma_writer_only() to make
> precedence clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists