[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y0ouuc8c.fsf@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:12:35 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko
<mhocko@...nel.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Johannes
Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, JP
Kobryn <inwardvessel@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau
<martin.lau@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Kumar Kartikeya
Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/23] mm: introduce BPF kfuncs to deal with memcg
pointers
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:17:11PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>> +__bpf_kfunc struct mem_cgroup *
>> +bpf_get_mem_cgroup(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>> +{
>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>> + bool rcu_unlock = false;
>> +
>> + if (!root_mem_cgroup)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + if (root_mem_cgroup->css.ss != css->ss) {
>> + struct cgroup *cgroup = css->cgroup;
>> + int ssid = root_mem_cgroup->css.ss->id;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + rcu_unlock = true;
>> + css = rcu_dereference_raw(cgroup->subsys[ssid]);
>
> Would it make more sense to use cgroup_e_css()?
Good call, will update in the next version.
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists