[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a97d3a33-23c4-43c5-b3d0-4b211f120986@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:55:22 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, Maciej Wieczor-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, Chen Yu
<yu.c.chen@...el.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 20/31] fs/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir()
Hi Tony,
On 10/28/25 11:40 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:40:44AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Modifying mon_add_all_files() sounds good. I assume the node activation (kernfs_active())
>> will still be done by the caller which would have this new function return a struct kernfs_node *?
>> If so, I think it will make code easier to read if name implies that a new kn is created.
>> Since the caller is already mkdir_mondata_subdir(), what do you think of _mkdir_mondata_subdir()?
>
> Reinette,
>
> This section of fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c now looks like this. Call sites
> are now free of duplicated code. Thanks for the nudge to do this.
>
>
> /*
> * Create a directory for a domain and populate it with monitor files.
Could you please add a short snippet about the different meanings of @hdr? It does not
have to be entirely kernel-doc style, just a note for the developer trying to understand
this function. Something like: "Create summing monitors when @hdr is NULL. No need to
initialize summing monitors."
> */
...
I find this new version much easier to parse. Thank you very much.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists