[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89ae527a-c4b4-4294-93ae-e9afffb11f7a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:54:52 +0800
From: Yongxing Mou <yongxing.mou@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Abhinav Kumar
<abhinav.kumar@...ux.dev>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/5] dt-bindings: display/msm: Document MDSS on
QCS8300
On 10/27/2025 7:52 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 10:40:39PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 03:43:56PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 27/09/2025 08:26, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 01:34:39PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 18/09/2025 13:14, Yongxing Mou wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>> process in other patchsets and in my understanding on how to describe
>>>> the particular hardware block. The changes were reflected in the
>>>> changelog. If you plan to review this patchset once you get back from
>>>> your vacation, that's fine. If you don't plan to, I can ask Yongxing to
>>>> send v20 just for that number.
>>>
>>> Solution for me could be to ignore Qualcomm patches till they reach some
>>> sort of maturity.
>>>
>>> I am not planning to review this patch, because:
>>> 1. I already reviewed it, so not really necessary, but even if I wanted:
>>> 2. It is gone from my inbox...
>>
>> So... Should it be resent to get it back to your inbox or should
>> Yongxing just restore your tag on the grounds that the changes were not
>> significant enough to drop it?
>
> Granted the lack of response, Yongxing, please send the new iteration of
> the patchset.
>
Sure. Thanks for the reply. Should i add back the reviewed-by tag or
just resend the this series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists