linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <870075785A1ED2B9+6fb5238e-dc57-406b-acf9-b88b237d8e5b@radxa.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:44:49 +0900
From: FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@...xa.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Joseph Kogut <joseph.kogut@...il.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Steve deRosier <derosier@...-sierra.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO board

Hi Joseph

Your patch seems to be NAKed.
I will submit new patch soon.

Best regards,

--
FUKAUMI Naoki
Radxa Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

On 10/28/25 18:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/10/2025 10:33, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20250528221823.2974653-2-joseph.kogut@gmail.com/
>>
>> On 5/29/25 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 03:18:21PM GMT, Joseph Kogut wrote:
>>>> Add device tree binding for the Radxa CM5 IO board.
>>>>
>>>> This board is based on the rk3588s.
>>>
>>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Please explain the sorting rule used for this file. You must have known
>> the sorting rule; otherwise, how can you be sure this patch is correct?
> 
> Huh? I don't have a clue about sorting rule but if you mock my review
> let's make it different:
> 
> NAK
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>