[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63f3d1af-8620-465d-8dd0-30a42a36305d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:47:53 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sm6350-camss
On 10/28/25 10:24 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue Oct 28, 2025 at 9:54 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 02:23:59PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
[...]
>> There are no dots in property names. Are you sure these are called
>> VDDA_0.9 in the device datasheet (not schematics)? Please look at other
>> bindings how this is being named, depending whether this is PHY or PLL
>> supply (or only PHY).
>
> The following power supplies are mentioned:
>
> * VDD_CAMSS_PLL_0P9 - Camera SS PLL 0.9 V circuits
> (not referenced in downstream kernel, connected to vreg_s5a in
> schematics)
> * VDD_A_CSI_x_0P9 - MIPI CSIx 0.9 V circuits
> With pad names VDD_A_CSI_0_0P9 to VDD_A_CSI_3_0P9
> * VDD_A_CSI_x_1P25 - MIPI CSIx 1.25 V circuits
> With pad names VDD_A_CSI_0_1P25 to VDD_A_CSI_3_1P25
I can corroborate this
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists