[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b95eecd5-3dab-4557-aa2a-36f58779c230@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:13:55 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>, Zhu Yanjun
<yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Shay Drori <shayd@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5: Add balance ID support for LAG
multiplane groups
On 10/26/25 1:53 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 26/10/2025 1:59, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> 在 2025/10/23 2:16, Tariq Toukan 写道:
>>> 1. Add the hardware interface bits (load_balance_id and lag_per_mp_group)
>>> 2. Clean up some duplicate code while we're here
>>> 3. Rework the system image GUID infrastructure to handle variable lengths
>>> 4. Update PTP clock pairing to use the new approach
>>> 5. Restructure capability setting to make room for the new feature
>>> 6. Actually implement the balance ID support
>>>
>>> The key insight is in patch 6: we only append the balance ID when both
>>
>> In the above, patch 6 is the following patch? It should be patch 5?
>>
>> [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/mlx5: Add balance ID support for LAG multiplane
>> groups
>>
>> Yanjun.Zhu
>
> Right.
>
> Indices shifted because we sent the preparation IFC patch a priori:
> 137d1a635513 net/mlx5: IFC add balance ID and LAG per MP group bits
No need to repost. I'll adjust the indexes while applying the series.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists