[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dbb5f7b4-7dac-413e-8c0a-4f962b79eae0@rock-chips.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:42:51 +0800
From: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: pwm: Add a new binding for
rockchip,rk3576-pwm
Hi Conor,
On 10/28/2025 4:50 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:06:15AM +0800, Damon Ding wrote:
>> On 10/28/2025 1:11 AM, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
>
>> The RK3506 and RV1126B platforms that are about to be upstream also use this
>> PWM IP. Would it be better to name the yaml file "pwm-rockchip-v4.yaml"?
>
> No. Files should be named to match a compatibles.
>
>> Then subsequent platforms only need to expand the compatible property.
>
> That's all subsequent platforms need to do anyway!
Got it.
Best regards,
Damon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists