lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176165026321.34697.8358441420241761264.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:17:43 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, 
 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, 
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-mem: Trace exec_op

On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:03:33 -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The spi subsystem has tracing, which is very convenient when debugging
> problems. Add tracing for spi-mem too so that accesses that skip the spi
> subsystem can still be seen.
> 
> The format is roughly based on the existing spi tracing. We don't bother
> tracing the op's address because the tracing happens while the memory is
> locked, so there can be no confusion about the matching of start and
> stop. The conversion of cmd/addr/dummy to an array is directly analogous
> to the conversion in the latter half of spi_mem_exec_op.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-mem: Trace exec_op
      commit: 77a58ba7c64ccca20616aa03599766ccb0d1a330

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ