[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251028120652.AJUTgtwZ@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 13:06:52 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Crystal Wood <crwood@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Attila Fazekas <afazekas@...hat.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver OHalloran <oohall@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genirq/manage: Reduce priority of forced secondary
interrupt handler
On 2025-10-27 13:59:31 [+0100], Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Crystal reports that the PCIe Advanced Error Reporting driver gets stuck
> in an infinite loop on PREEMPT_RT:
>
> Both the primary interrupt handler aer_irq() as well as the secondary
> handler aer_isr() are forced into threads with identical priority.
> Crystal writes that on the ARM system in question, the primary handler
> has to clear an error in the Root Error Status register...
>
> "before the next error happens, or else the hardware will set the
> Multiple ERR_COR Received bit. If that bit is set, then aer_isr()
> can't rely on the Error Source Identification register, so it scans
> through all devices looking for errors -- and for some reason, on
> this system, accessing the AER registers (or any Config Space above
> 0x400, even though there are capabilities located there) generates
> an Unsupported Request Error (but returns valid data). Since this
> happens more than once, without aer_irq() preempting, it causes
> another multi error and we get stuck in a loop."
>
> The issue does not show on non-PREEMPT_RT because the primary handler
> runs in hardirq context and thus can preempt the threaded secondary
> handler, clear the Root Error Status register and prevent the secondary
> handler from getting stuck.
Not sure if I mentioned it before but this is due to forced threaded
IRQs which can also be enabled on non-PREEMPT_RT systems via `threadirqs`.
> Emulate the same behavior on PREEMPT_RT by assigning a lower default
> priority to the secondary handler if the primary handler is forced into
> a thread.
>
> Reported-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Crystal Wood <crwood@...hat.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250902224441.368483-1-crwood@redhat.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -856,6 +856,19 @@ void sched_set_fifo_low(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_set_fifo_low);
>
> +/*
> + * For when the primary interrupt handler is forced into a thread, in addition
> + * to the (always threaded) secondary handler. The secondary handler gets a
> + * slightly lower priority so that the primary handler can preempt it, thereby
> + * emulating the behavior of a non-PREEMPT_RT system where the primary handler
> + * runs in hardirq context.
s/non-PREEMPT_RT/non-forced threaded/ ?
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists