[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C74C62EC-EBF7-4244-9085-C3219C24EF71@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:28:31 +0000
From: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Sean Hefty <shefty@...dia.com>,
Vlad
Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@...dia.com>,
Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@...dia.com>, Jacob
Moroni <jmoroni@...gle.com>,
Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cm: Base cm_id destruction timeout on CMA
values
> On 27 Oct 2025, at 12:36, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:27:33 +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>> When a GSI MAD packet is sent on the QP, it will potentially be
>> retried CMA_MAX_CM_RETRIES times with a timeout value of:
>>
>> 4.096usec * 2 ^ CMA_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT
>>
>> The above equates to ~64 seconds using the default CMA values.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
Thanks, Leon!
Håkon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists