[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251029-aufweichen-pechschwarz-7eba2f4f6ffb@brauner>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:54:59 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: push list presence check into inode_io_list_del()
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 04:31:11PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> For consistency with sb routines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
> ---
Hm, what is this based on? It doesn't apply to vfs-6.19.inode at all.
Could you please resend?
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 3 +++
> fs/inode.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index f784d8b09b04..5dccbe5fb09d 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1349,6 +1349,9 @@ void inode_io_list_del(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct bdi_writeback *wb;
>
> + if (list_empty(&inode->i_io_list))
> + return;
> +
> wb = inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(inode);
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index 3153d725859c..274350095537 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -789,9 +789,7 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
> BUG_ON(!(inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_FREEING));
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_lru));
>
> - if (!list_empty(&inode->i_io_list))
> - inode_io_list_del(inode);
> -
> + inode_io_list_del(inode);
> inode_sb_list_del(inode);
>
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists