linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Bluetooth: dt-bindings: qualcomm: Split binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeGLUvyM5GGv=eFpKd8_KCcSOnfKXCtZqJwpTGuRTixxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:13:47 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Balakrishna Godavarthi <quic_bgodavar@...cinc.com>, Rocky Liao <quic_rjliao@...cinc.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Bluetooth: dt-bindings: qualcomm: Split binding

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 8:44 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop in few commits the properties (supplies) from
>   qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml which are not used by devices left there,
>   instead of removing them in final patch (qcom,wcn7850-bt).
> - Fix dt_binding_check error - missing gpio.h header in the example.
> - Drop maintainers update - split into separate patch.
> - Add also Bartosz as maintainer of two bindings because he was working
>   with these in the past.
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20251028-dt-bindings-qcom-bluetooth-v1-0-524a978e3cda@linaro.org
>
> One big Qualcomm Bluetooth schema is hardly manageable: it lists all
> possible properties (19 supplies).  Split qcom,qca6390-bt to separate
> bindings, so device schema will be easier to read/maintain and list only
> relevant properties.
>
> What's more it messes up old (pre-PMU) and new (post-PMU) description in
> one place adding to the total mess.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Thanks for doing this. I would argue that the deprecation of the
legacy supplies could happen before the split but that's not really
important and would probably be harder to read.

Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>