[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ohylqbvlcdu36hbe32jydpfx6ecaajqjzcmvyhdgktci2mzi2@3lcuydcqbzmp>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:32:16 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>, 
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, 
	Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, 
	yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: qce: fix version check
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:41:48AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 10/29/25 9:25 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> > From: Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
> > 
> > The previous version check made it difficult to support newer major
> > versions (e.g., v6.0) without adding extra checks/macros. Update the
> > logic to only reject v5.0 and allow future versions without additional
> > changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > index e95e84486d9a..b966f3365b7d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> > @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
> >  #include "sha.h"
> >  #include "aead.h"
> >  
> > -#define QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5	0x05
> >  #define QCE_QUEUE_LENGTH	1
> >  
> >  #define QCE_DEFAULT_MEM_BANDWIDTH	393600
> > @@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ static int qce_check_version(struct qce_device *qce)
> >  	 * the driver does not support v5 with minor 0 because it has special
> >  	 * alignment requirements.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (major != QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5 || minor == 0)
> > +	if (major == 5 && minor == 0)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> 
> This also allows major < 5, should we add a second check to reject that?
> 
The comment says we don't support v5.0, now the code says the same.
I think it's okay to leave handling of previous versions as undefined.
Given the current way this is expressed, there's can't be any existing
users...
Regards,
Bjorn
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
