[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <938a1d18-c7b0-45d6-ac4b-4c1246e08044@efficios.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:54:12 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, Michael Jeanson
 <mjeanson@...icios.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
 Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
 Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 09/20] cpumask: Cache num_possible_cpus()
On 2025-10-29 09:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[...]
>   
> +void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
Unless I'm missing something, I suspect that "set_cpu_possible()" should
be marked as __init.
Thanks,
Mathieu
-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
