[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69023512.5d0a0220.3cccb7.8e65@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:38:53 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] err.h: add ERR_PTR_CONST macro
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Add ERR_PTR_CONST macro to initialize global variables with error
> 
> ERR_PTR_CONST()
> 
> > pointers. This might be useful for specific case where there is a global
> > variables initialized to an error condition and then later set to the
> > real handle once probe finish/completes.
> 
> Okay, this has two caveats:
> 
> 1) naming is bad as it suggests something about const qualifier (and not, it's
> not about that at all);
> 
> 2) it doesn't explain what's wrong with ERR_PTR().
>
It can't be used for global variables as it does cause compilation
error.
I wanted to use ERR_PTR to set the __smem handle instead of freecode
(void *) -EPROBE_DEFER and notice the compiler doesn't like using
ERR_PTR().
Then the problem is clear as static declaration require constant value
for initialization and ERR_PTR is a inline function.
This is why ERR_PTR_CONST following the pattern that was used for
FIELD_PREP -> FIELD_PREP_CONST that was also introduced for similar
case.
So yes this is specific for case of static global variables.
> ...
> 
> Note, I'm not objecting an idea as a whole.
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
> 
-- 
	Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
