[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6069f4ab-252e-4f83-8c8f-cbab4ae8cd94@web.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:32:05 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
Jyothi Kumar Seerapu <quic_jseerapu@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: qcom: gpi: Fix memory leak in
gpi_peripheral_config()
…
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c
> @@ -1605,14 +1605,16 @@ static int
> gpi_peripheral_config(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_config *config)
> {
…
> + new_config = krealloc(gchan->config, config->peripheral_size, GFP_NOWAIT);
> + if (!new_config)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + gchan->config = new_config;
> memcpy(gchan->config, config->peripheral_config, config->peripheral_size);
How do you think about to apply the following source code variant?
gchan->config = memcpy(new_config, config->peripheral_config, config->peripheral_size);
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists