[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h5vhtm3v.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:49:08 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>, Madadi
Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@...ux.ibm.com>, K Prateek Nayak
<kprateek.nayak@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V3 00/12] rseq: Implement time slice extension mechanism
On Wed, Oct 29 2025 at 11:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:10:55 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> > and in git:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git rseq/cid
>> >
>> > For your convenience all of it is also available as a conglomerate from
>> > git:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git rseq/slice
>>
>> rseq/slice is older than rseq/cid. rseq/slice has the
>> __put_kernel_nofault typo. rseq/cid looks correct.
>
> Yeah, I started looking at both too, and checking out req/slice and trying
> to do a rebase on top of rseq/cid causes a bunch of conflicts.
>
> I'm continuing the rebase and just skipping the changed commits.
Forgot to push the updated branch out....
Fixed now.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists