[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251029220711.57909-1-zide.chen@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 15:07:10 -0700
From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
	Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Skip discovery table for offline dies
This warning can be triggered if NUMA is disabled and the system
boots with fewer CPUs than the number of CPUs in die 0.
WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 7257 at uncore.c:1157 uncore_pci_pmu_register+0x136/0x160 [intel_uncore]
Currently, the discovery table continues to be parsed even if all CPUs
in the associated die are offline. This can lead to an array overflow
at "pmu->boxes[die] = box" in uncore_pci_pmu_register(), which may
trigger the warning above or cause other issues.
Reported-by: Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>
Fixes: edae1f06c2cd ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Parse uncore discovery tables")
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c           | 4 ++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index ee586eb714ec..5c3aeea5c78d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1380,6 +1380,10 @@ static void uncore_pci_pmus_register(void)
 
 		for (node = rb_first(type->boxes); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
 			unit = rb_entry(node, struct intel_uncore_discovery_unit, node);
+
+			if (WARN_ON(unit->die >= uncore_max_dies()))
+				continue;
+
 			pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(UNCORE_DISCOVERY_PCI_DOMAIN(unit->addr),
 							   UNCORE_DISCOVERY_PCI_BUS(unit->addr),
 							   UNCORE_DISCOVERY_PCI_DEVFN(unit->addr));
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
index 1bf6e4288577..d6aee12139f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static bool intel_uncore_has_discovery_tables_pci(int *ignore)
 				     (val & UNCORE_DISCOVERY_DVSEC2_BIR_MASK) * UNCORE_DISCOVERY_BIR_STEP;
 
 			die = get_device_die_id(dev);
-			if (die < 0)
+			if ((die < 0) || (die >= uncore_max_dies()))
 				continue;
 
 			parse_discovery_table(dev, die, bar_offset, &parsed, ignore);
-- 
2.51.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
