[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fcd5562-a367-41e9-8bff-51e5990145e2@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:28:10 +0800
From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Cc: shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>,
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>,
"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PCI: dw-rockchip: Add remove callback for resource
cleanup
在 2025/10/28 星期二 17:34, Anand Moon 写道:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Thanks for your review comments.
>
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 at 05:56, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>>
>> 在 2025/10/27 星期一 22:55, Anand Moon 写道:
>>> Introduce a .remove() callback to the Rockchip DesignWare PCIe
>>> controller driver to ensure proper resource deinitialization during
>>> device removal. This includes disabling clocks and deinitializing the
>>> PCIe PHY.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>> index 87dd2dd188b4..b878ae8e2b3e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>>> @@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>> +
>>> + /* Perform other cleanups as necessary */
>>> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
>>> + rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);
>>> +}
>>
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> Dou you need to call dw_pcie_host_deinit()?
> I feel the rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit will power off the phy
>> And I think you should also try to mask PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC and
>> remove the irq domain as well.
>>
>> if (rockchip->irq_domain) {
>> int virq, j;
>> for (j = 0; j < PCI_NUM_INTX; j++) {
>> virq = irq_find_mapping(rockchip->irq_domain, j);
>> if (virq > 0)
>> irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
>> }
>> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(rockchip->irq, NULL, NULL);
>> irq_domain_remove(rockchip->irq_domain);
>> }
>>
> I have implemented resource cleanup in rockchip_pcie_remove,
> which is invoked when the system is shutting down.
> Your feedback on the updated code is welcome.
>
> static void rockchip_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int irq;
>
> irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "legacy");
> if (irq < 0)
> return;
>
> /* Perform other cleanups as necessary */
> /* clear up INTR staatus register */
> rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, 0xffffffff,
> PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC);
> if (rockchip->irq_domain) {
> int virq, j;
> for (j = 0; j < PCI_NUM_INTX; j++) {
> virq = irq_find_mapping(rockchip->irq_domain, j);
> if (virq > 0)
> irq_dispose_mapping(virq);
> }
> irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, NULL, NULL);
> irq_domain_remove(rockchip->irq_domain);
> }
>
> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
> /* poweroff the phy */
> rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);
> /* release the reset */
release? Or "reset the controller"?
> reset_control_assert(rockchip->rst);
> pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> pm_runtime_no_callbacks(dev);
> }
>
>> Another thin I noticed is should we call pm_runtime_* here for hope that
>> genpd could be powered donw once removed?
>>
> I could not find 'genpd' (power domain) used in the PCIe driver
> If we have an example to use genpd I will update this.
> > I am also looking into adding NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
That sounds good, you can pick up my patch[1] if you'd like to continue
addressing the comments that I haven't had time to think more.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg171846.html
>
> Thanks
> -Anand
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists