lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <gyvhwl4rr2xt2alxap2x4fwkvseaiie75ovaf26fpxng7b47tz@emshhyrkhjl3>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:14:03 +0900
From: Koichiro Den <den@...inux.co.jp>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: ntb@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdmason@...zu.us, 
	dave.jiang@...el.com, allenbh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] NTB: ntb_transport: Handle remapped contiguous
 region in vmalloc space

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:45:30AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025-10-27 19:14, Koichiro Den wrote:
> > 
> > I agree there's room for improvement around this "double" mapping.
> > I'll think about a follow-up patch to clean this up.
> > 
> >>
> >> At the very least, I think these issues need to be mentioned in the
> >> commit message.
> > 
> > As for the commit message, I think adding one more line like:
> > "See relevant commit 061a785a114f ("ntb: Force physically contiguous allocation of rx ring buffers")"
> > should be sufficient. What do you think?
> 
> Ah, I see why that is now. Thanks for the explanation.
> 
> Adding the link helps, but I still think the commit message needs to
> mention why the memory is guaranteed to be physically contiguous.

That makes sense, I'll do so. Thanks for the review!

-Koichiro

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ