[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a41e45b2-6e50-4236-a71d-ec3fbaccc2b1@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:41:48 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
        trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: qce: fix version check
On 10/29/25 9:25 AM, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> From: Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
> 
> The previous version check made it difficult to support newer major
> versions (e.g., v6.0) without adding extra checks/macros. Update the
> logic to only reject v5.0 and allow future versions without additional
> changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kashyap <gaurav.kashyap@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> index e95e84486d9a..b966f3365b7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@
>  #include "sha.h"
>  #include "aead.h"
>  
> -#define QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5	0x05
>  #define QCE_QUEUE_LENGTH	1
>  
>  #define QCE_DEFAULT_MEM_BANDWIDTH	393600
> @@ -161,7 +160,7 @@ static int qce_check_version(struct qce_device *qce)
>  	 * the driver does not support v5 with minor 0 because it has special
>  	 * alignment requirements.
>  	 */
> -	if (major != QCE_MAJOR_VERSION5 || minor == 0)
> +	if (major == 5 && minor == 0)
>  		return -ENODEV;
This also allows major < 5, should we add a second check to reject that?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
