[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025102912-cosmetics-reflector-ab4f@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:20:38 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vijayendra Suman <vijayendra.suman@...cle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org,
sr@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/123] 5.15.196-rc1 review
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 09:11:58PM +0530, Vijayendra Suman wrote:
>
>
> On 28/10/25 12:04 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.196 release.
> > There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:34:15 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/
> > patch-5.15.196-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> perf failed to compile with following errors at compilation.
>
> BUILDSTDERR: tests/perf-record.c: In function 'test__PERF_RECORD':
> BUILDSTDERR: tests/perf-record.c:118:17: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'evlist__cancel_workload'; did you mean 'evlist__start_workload'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> BUILDSTDERR: 118 | evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
> BUILDSTDERR: | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> BUILDSTDERR: | evlist__start_workload
>
>
> There is no definition for evlist__cancel_workload
>
> Following are references of 'evlist__cancel_workload'
> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:118: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:130: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:142: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
> tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c:155: evlist__cancel_workload(evlist);
>
>
> Commit which need to be reverted.
> b7e5c59f3b09 perf test: Don't leak workload gopipe in PERF_RECORD_*
This is already being reverted in the latest -rc release, does that not
work here for you?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists