[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQNsecHJSO2U68Fc@stanley.mountain>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:47:37 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, cocci@...ia.fr,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [cocci] [RFC] Increasing usage of direct pointer assignments
from memcpy() calls with SmPL?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 01:31:49PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2025, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > @@ -2600,8 +2600,8 @@ static int __init init_hyp_mode(void)
> > goto out_err;
> > }
> >
> > + memcpy(page_address(page), CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start), nvhe_percpu_size());
> > page_addr = page_address(page);
> > - memcpy(page_addr, CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start), nvhe_percpu_size());
> > kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base)[cpu] = (unsigned long)page_addr;
> > }
>
> Not sure what is the point of all this. Try:
>
> - target = object; memcpy(target, source, size);
> + target = memcpy(target, source, size);
No one will thank you for making these changes... :( Please don't do
it.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists