[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6tgbavtf2dqc44ebfighrs5chzx4j4zdmjk77fmulwqbhrex2b@lou7ekbsjekr>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:23:24 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/29] i2c: mux: Create missing devlink between mux
and adapter physical device
Hi Herve,
...
> When an i2c mux is involved in an i2c path, the struct dev topology is
> the following:
supernitpick: I'd leave blank line here.
> +----------------+ +-------------------+
> | i2c controller | | i2c mux |
> | device | | device |
> | ^ | | |
> | | | | |
> | dev's parent | | |
> | | | | |
> | i2c adapter | | i2c adapter chanX |
> | device <---- dev's parent ------ device |
> | (no driver) | | (no driver) |
> +----------------+ +-------------------+
>
...
> No relationship exists between the i2c mux device itself and the i2c
> controller device (physical device) in order to have the i2c mux device
> calling i2c_del_adapter() to remove its downtream adapters and so,
/downtream/downstream/
> release references taken to the upstream adapter.
...
> + /*
> + * There is no relationship set between the mux device and the physical
> + * device handling the parent adapter. Create this missing relationship
> + * in order to remove the i2c mux device (consumer) and so the dowstream
> + * channel adapters before removing the physical device (supplier) which
> + * handles the i2c mux upstream adapter.
> + */
> + parent_physdev = i2c_get_adapter_physdev(parent);
> + if (!parent_physdev) {
> + dev_err(muxc->dev, "failed to get the parent physical device\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
-ENODEV?
> + goto err_free_priv;
> + }
> + dl = device_link_add(muxc->dev, parent_physdev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
Not to call twice put_device, I would add it once here and then
check for !dl.
> + if (!dl) {
> + dev_err(muxc->dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n",
> + dev_name(parent_physdev));
> + put_device(parent_physdev);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
same here, should this be -ENODEV?
Andi
> + goto err_free_priv;
> + }
> + put_device(parent_physdev);
> +
> if (force_nr) {
> priv->adap.nr = force_nr;
> ret = i2c_add_numbered_adapter(&priv->adap);
> --
> 2.51.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists