linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADS1120 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPXPSLKa9SasCpunrTSuoYaPcvPGTCZX+FPs9uq19m8a2XNRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 22:28:10 +0530
From: Ajith Anandhan <ajithanandhan0406@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com, 
	nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADS1120 ADC

Hi Krzysztof,

Thank you for the feedback! I’ll resend this as a regular PATCH series
shortly. I appreciate you taking the time to review.

Best regards,
Ajith

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:19 PM Ajith Anandhan
<ajithanandhan0406@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the feedback! I’ll resend this as regular PATCH series shortly. I appreciate you taking the time to review.
>
> Best regards,
> Ajith
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:10 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 30/10/2025 17:34, Ajith Anandhan wrote:
>> > This RFC patch series adds support for the Texas Instruments ADS1120,
>> > a precision 16-bit delta-sigma ADC with SPI interface.
>> >
>> > The driver provides:
>> > - 4 single-ended voltage input channels
>> > - Programmable gain amplifier (1 to 128)
>> > - Configurable data rates (20 to 1000 SPS)
>> > - Single-shot conversion mode
>> >
>> > I'm looking for feedback on:
>> > 1. The implementation approach for single-shot conversions
>> > 2. Any other suggestions for improvement
>>
>>
>> No need to call your patches RFC then. It only stops from merging and
>> some people will not review the code (RFC means not ready for inclusion).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof