linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] err.h: add ERR_PTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQMj4Bth84UnlT2e@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:37:52 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] err.h: add ERR_PTR_CONST macro

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:27:38AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:38:53PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:32:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 02:33:19PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > > Add ERR_PTR_CONST macro to initialize global variables with error
> > > 
> > > ERR_PTR_CONST()
> > > 
> > > > pointers. This might be useful for specific case where there is a global
> > > > variables initialized to an error condition and then later set to the
> > > > real handle once probe finish/completes.
> > > 
> > > Okay, this has two caveats:
> > > 
> > > 1) naming is bad as it suggests something about const qualifier (and not, it's
> > > not about that at all);
> > > 
> > > 2) it doesn't explain what's wrong with ERR_PTR().
> > >
> > 
> > It can't be used for global variables as it does cause compilation
> > error.
> 
> Can you show an example, please?

Ah, it's probably due to static inline...

> > I wanted to use ERR_PTR to set the __smem handle instead of freecode
> > (void *) -EPROBE_DEFER and notice the compiler doesn't like using
> > ERR_PTR().
> > 
> > Then the problem is clear as static declaration require constant value
> > for initialization and ERR_PTR is a inline function.
> > 
> > This is why ERR_PTR_CONST following the pattern that was used for
> > FIELD_PREP -> FIELD_PREP_CONST that was also introduced for similar
> > case.
> > 
> > So yes this is specific for case of static global variables.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko