lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc66b416-6d35-4e7f-af9c-6a0831dc1fb7@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:43:02 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@...il.com>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] bpf: initial support for attaching struct ops to
 cgroups



On 10/27/25 4:17 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> When a struct ops is being attached and a bpf link is created,
> allow to pass a cgroup fd using bpf attr, so that struct ops
> can be attached to a cgroup instead of globally.
> 
> Attached struct ops doesn't hold a reference to the cgroup,
> only preserves cgroup id.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
> ---
>   include/linux/bpf.h         |  1 +
>   kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index eae907218188..7205b813e25f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1849,6 +1849,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_link {
>   	struct bpf_link link;
>   	struct bpf_map __rcu *map;
>   	wait_queue_head_t wait_hup;
> +	u64 cgroup_id;
>   };
>   
>   struct bpf_link_primer {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> index 45cc5ee19dc2..58664779a2b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>   #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
>   #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
>   #include <linux/poll.h>
> +#include <linux/cgroup.h>
>   
>   struct bpf_struct_ops_value {
>   	struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common;
> @@ -1359,6 +1360,18 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>   	}
>   	bpf_link_init(&link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS, &bpf_struct_ops_map_lops, NULL,
>   		      attr->link_create.attach_type);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
> +	if (attr->link_create.cgroup.relative_fd) {
> +		struct cgroup *cgrp;
> +
> +		cgrp = cgroup_get_from_fd(attr->link_create.cgroup.relative_fd);
> +		if (IS_ERR(cgrp))
> +			return PTR_ERR(cgrp);
> +
> +		link->cgroup_id = cgroup_id(cgrp);

Not sure storing the cgroup_id or storing the memcg/cgroup pointer is 
better here. Regardless, link->cgroup_id should be cleared in 
bpf_struct_ops_map_link_detach(). The cgroup_id probably is useful to 
bpf_struct_ops_map_link_show_fdinfo().

> +		cgroup_put(cgrp);
> +	}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */
>   
>   	err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
>   	if (err)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ