[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a725785-2eec-4acf-bcc1-427c0e88726a@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:17:01 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: Update the SDCC clock to use
 shared_floor_ops
On 10/29/25 11:31 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/29/2025 3:17 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> I noticed none of SM8[1234567]50 / hamoa / glymur uses _shared_ here.. 
>>
>> I see that e.g. SM8250's downstream sets it though - should some of
>> these be fixed up too?
> 
> I wanted to fix them as well, just trying to check the downstream
> history of these clocks and then update them.
Nice, thanks 
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
